CO129-009 - Public Offices - 1844 — Page 61

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All AI Reviewed

Cond

to have offended against the provisions of the Ordinance – but the Enactment does not prescribe within what limits such seizure and detention should take place.

The exercise of this power, however, is made to depend upon the special instruction and authority of the Superintendent, whose attention should be called to the Enactment in order that he

may confine its operation

within the proper

limits of jurisdiction.

Upon this point I am

to state that

presuming it to be the intention of the

+ vessels Engaged

Ordinance that

in the

prohibited trade should be seized and

such seizure detained whilst at sea, detention could not lawfully take place more than 100 miles from the coast of China, which is the extreme limit of the legislative authority conferrable under the powers of 6,7 Victoria Cap 80.

I am also to notice the 8th Section of the

Ordinance, which is as follows:-

"And be it further Enacted, that all ships or vessels sailing under the British Flag, which shall have been employed in

any way

to offend against the Provisions of this Ordinance, shall, together with their Cargoes be liable to be seized and sold, to satisfy any penalty incurred by such Employment and that all Bills of Sale, Mortgages and other Transfers of property therein made,

such vessel having been so unlawfully employed, within three months from the time suit having been commenced against Owner or Master thereof, for any offence against this Ordinance, or made whatsoever to the knowledge of the purchaser

with

time

to avoid the recovery of the

penalties herein provided, shall, as against

the said liability to be sold for the purposes aforesaid, be void and of None effect"

The latter portion of this Enactment may create insecurity to titles to vessels unless confined to transfers or mortgages after seizure,

or to transfers mortgages made

before

Edit History

2026-05-16 20:37:00 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct
Live
View comparison
AI Proofread
Cond to have offended against the provisions of the Ordinance but the Enactment does not prescribe within what limits such seizure and detention should take place. The exercise of this power, however, is made to depend upon the special instruction and authority of the Superintendent, whose attention should be called to the Enactment in order that he may confine its operation within the proper limits of jurisdiction. Upon this point I am to state that presuming it to be the intention of the + vessels Engaged Ordinance that in the prohibited trade should be seized and such seizure detained whilst at sea, detention could not lawfully take place more than 100 miles from the coast of China, which is the extreme limit of the legislative authority conferrable under the powers of 6,7 Victoria Cap 80. I am also to notice the 8th Section of the Ordinance, which is as follows:- "And be it further Enacted, that all ships or vessels sailing under the British Flag, which shall have been employed in any way to offend against the Provisions of this Ordinance, shall, together with their Cargoes be liable to be seized and sold, to satisfy any penalty incurred by such Employment and that all Bills of Sale, Mortgages and other Transfers of property therein made, such vessel having been so unlawfully employed, within three months from the time suit having been commenced against Owner or Master thereof, for any offence against this Ordinance, or made whatsoever to the knowledge of the purchaser with time to avoid the recovery of the penalties herein provided, shall, as against the said liability to be sold for the purposes aforesaid, be void and of None effect" The latter portion of this Enactment may create insecurity to titles to vessels unless confined to transfers or mortgages after seizure, or to transfers mortgages made before
Baseline (Original)
Cond to have offruded aganist the provisions of the Ordinance but the Enactment does not prescribe within what limits such secgure and detention should take place. The exercise of this power, however, is made to depends upon the special instruction and authority of the Superintendent, whose attrution should be called to the Enactment in order that he may coefine its operation within the proper Cimits of jurisdiction. Javi Apon this point I and to state that presuming it to be the intention of the + vessels Engaged Ordinance that. in the prohibited trade should be seized and bond such seigure detained whilst at sea, detention could not lawfully take place more than 100 miles from the coast of China, which is the extreme limit of the -legislative authority conferrable under the howers of 6,7 Victoria Cap 80. I am also to notice the 8th Section of the Ordinance, which is as follows:- "And be it further Enacted, that all ships or bessels sailing under the British Flag, which shall have been employed in any way Joas this 57 to offend against the Rovisions of Ordinance, shall, together with their Cargoes be liable to be seized and sold, to satisfy any penalty incurred by such Employment and that all Bills of Sale, Mortgages and other Transfers of property therein made, such vessel Hall ___ of any the within three months after have been so unlawfully employed, within three months from the time. suit having been commruled against. Owner or Master thereof, for any offence aganist this Ordnance, or made a whatsoever to the knowledge of the purchase= vicis to roade the recovery of the with 4. atang time penalties herein provided, shall, as against. the said liability to be sold for the purposes aforesaid, be void and of None affect" The latter portion of this Enactment may create insecurity to titles to arsels unless confined to transfers or mortgages after. secgure, or to transfers mortgages made before.
2026-05-16 20:37:00 · Baseline
View content

Cond

to have offruded aganist the provisions of the Ordinance – but the Enactment does not prescribe within what limits such secgure and detention should take place.

The exercise of this power, however, is made to depends upon the special instruction and authority of the Superintendent, whose attrution should be called to the Enactment in order that he

may coefine its operation

within the proper

Cimits of jurisdiction.

Javi

Apon this point I and

to state that

presuming it to be the intention of the

+ vessels Engaged

Ordinance that.

in the

prohibited trade should be seized and

bond

such seigure detained whilst at sea, detention could not lawfully take place more than 100 miles from the coast of China, which is the extreme limit of the -legislative authority conferrable under the howers of 6,7 Victoria Cap 80.

I am also to notice the 8th Section of the

Ordinance, which is as follows:-

"And be it further Enacted, that all ships or bessels sailing under the British Flag, which shall have been employed in

any way

Joas

this

57

to offend against the Rovisions of Ordinance, shall, together with their Cargoes be liable to be seized and sold, to satisfy any penalty incurred by such Employment and that all Bills of Sale, Mortgages and other Transfers of property therein made,

such vessel Hall

___

of any

the

within three months after have been so unlawfully employed, within three months from the time. suit having been commruled against. Owner or Master thereof, for any offence aganist this Ordnance, or made a whatsoever to the knowledge of the purchase=

vicis to roade the recovery of the

with

4.

atang

time

penalties herein provided, shall, as against.

the said liability to be sold for the purposes aforesaid, be void and of None affect"

The latter portion of this Enactment may create insecurity to titles to arsels unless confined to transfers or mortgages after. secgure,

or to transfers mortgages made

before.

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.